The Tara Show

A chilling look at the rise of political violence on the American left — from mainstream attitudes to targeted threats. This episode explores alarming studies showing that 35% of liberals believe violence can sometimes be justified, contrasting sharply with conservative perspectives. We break down real-world incidents, including celebrations of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, threats against public figures, and targeted harassment of families. Featuring anecdotes from JD Vance and reports of teachers and activists inciting violence, this episode exposes how radicalized beliefs are spreading through schools, social media, and communities. From systemic threats to the normalization of political terror, we examine the stakes for free speech, public safety, and the future of American civil discourse. This is a deep dive into a culture of intimidation, radicalism, and the urgent need for awareness and action.

Trigger warning: discussion of assassination, threats, and political violence. Former South Carolina Freedom Caucus Chairman Adam Morgan joins the show to sound the alarm over professors and state employees accused of celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk — and, in some cases, suggesting more killings should follow. Morgan calls out Clemson, Coastal Carolina, Winthrop, and other schools for protecting employees he says are inciting violence with taxpayer dollars. From demands to defund universities that won’t fire staff, to warnings about cultural indoctrination in classrooms, Morgan lays out a fiery case for accountability. He blasts South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster’s silence, contrasts it with strong responses from leaders in Florida and Texas, and calls for a special session to strip funding from colleges that refuse to act. This episode pulls no punches on higher education, political hypocrisy, and the fight to stop the normalization of violence in South Carolina classrooms.

Clemson University faces mounting backlash after professors allegedly celebrated and encouraged political violence—testing the boundaries of free speech and taxpayer-funded employment. South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson steps in with a legal takedown, making clear that advocating murder is not a protected political position but incitement to violence. From angry alumni demanding refunds to comparisons with workplace and neighborhood norms, this episode exposes the radical double standard and explores whether universities are normalizing political terrorism under the guise of free expression.

Trigger warning: discussion of threats, assassination, and political violence. In this episode the host responds to a wave of alarming rhetoric — from alleged media distortions used to justify violence, to campus faculty accused of celebrating political murder. Featuring JD Vance’s blunt remarks, the episode examines how powerful institutions, funded outlets, and viral social posts can radicalize anger into real-world threats. You'll hear concrete examples (including an alleged Coastal Carolina employee’s violent tweets), critiques of elite funders and publications, and a raw call for accountability from university leaders. Expect an urgent, opinion-driven breakdown of: how propaganda can dehumanize political opponents, why “unity” isn’t possible with those who celebrate violence, the stakes for public institutions in red states like South Carolina, and practical steps the host urges listeners to take — from polite civic pressure to demanding firings and defunding when necessary. For listeners seeking a no-

Trigger warning: discussion of political violence, threats, and campus unrest. In this episode, the focus turns to Clemson University and the uproar over professors accused of normalizing political violence. Featuring JD Vance’s fiery remarks on the Charlie Kirk Show, the discussion ranges from personal stories of harassment — including Vance’s own children heckled at Disneyland — to claims of widespread acceptance of violence among the political left. The host highlights chilling anecdotes, viral videos of children repeating disturbing rhetoric, and the deeper cultural influence of media and education on young minds. Expect a raw, urgent analysis that contrasts “ballots not bullets” with what the host describes as the left’s growing tolerance for violent expression. With sharp criticism of Clemson’s handling of its faculty, accusations of double standards in political discourse, and warnings about the next generation being radicalized, this episode delivers a no-holds-barred call for accountability. For li

Trigger warning: discussion of assassination, threats, and political violence. In this episode we sift through the chilling aftermath of a targeted attack and the online chatter that preceded it — texts, notes and deleted posts that allegedly signaled the suspect’s intent toward Charlie Kirk. Using archive digs, eyewitness reports, and FBI comments, the host connects the dots between campus violence, organized disruption, and what they describe as institutional tolerance for inflammatory rhetoric. Expect an urgent, opinion-driven breakdown of: the disturbing pattern of online warnings and celebratory posts, alleged funding for groups tied to campus confrontations, the broader risk to public figures and students, and a direct call to hold university leaders accountable. This episode is for listeners who want a no-nonsense, investigative look at how rhetoric turns into real-world danger — and what citizens can do about it.

Trigger warning: discussion of political violence and campus unrest. In this episode we unpack a blistering take on what's happening on college campuses — from controversial Clemson faculty and alleged calls to violence, to a decades-long archive of clashes between leftist activists and conservative student groups like Turning Point USA. Using recovered headlines, on-the-ground accounts, and a private research archive, the host pieces together a narrative about how campus rhetoric can spill into real danger — and asks whether university leadership is doing enough to protect students and accountability. Expect a fast, opinionated deep dive: examples of campus mob violence, claims about institutional tolerance of extremist speech, the mechanics behind the host’s research archive, and a pointed call for action aimed at university administrators. This is for listeners who want an outspoken, unapologetic look at free speech, campus culture wars, and why the debate matters for public safety.

Today’s episode dives deep into the growing crisis of political violence and radicalization in the United States. From the assassination of Charlie Kirk to attempted attacks on public figures, we examine the patterns of extremism, online radicalization, and the disturbing influence of fringe groups. We explore eyewitness accounts, social media networks, and investigative insights, including the role of left-leaning activist groups, the mainstream media’s coverage, and the cultural ripple effects of these attacks. Experts and insiders reveal how ideologies, victimhood narratives, and online echo chambers are shaping a generation prone to radical action. This episode also discusses the societal choices Americans face, the responsibility of media and institutions, and the urgent need for clarity, discernment, and ethical engagement in the face of an increasingly volatile political landscape.

A raw, immediate episode examining the fallout from Charlie Kirk’s assassination — how the killing has intensified debates over political violence, campus accountability, and the limits of free speech. We unpack the weekend’s reactions, including public celebrations on social media and the national uproar over Clemson employees who allegedly lauded the attack, and ask whether institutions and lawmakers will use funding and policy to force accountability. This episode features on-the-ground examples, calls for defunding and ending tenure from state legislators, and a discussion about how to prevent rhetoric from turning into repeated violence. Trigger warning: this episode discusses threats, celebratory rhetoric about a recent killing, and political extremism.

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Utahns responded not with riots, but with vigils, prayers, and unity — a stark contrast to the chaos seen after George Floyd’s death. This episode draws parallels between Kirk and Martin Luther King Jr., framing Kirk as a modern civil-rights leader targeted for his defense of free speech and religious rights. We examine the national fallout: 32,000 new Turning Point USA chapter requests, global marches, and a rising movement branding Kirk as a civil-rights icon. At the same time, anger erupts over celebratory posts from academics and politicians, allegations of extremist networks tied to recent shootings, and mounting calls to defund institutions like Clemson for tolerating rhetoric that endorses violence. With bullets inscribed “Hey Fascist” and references to Antifa rallying cries, the debate over free speech, political violence, and accountability intensifies. Will this tragedy awaken a new civil-rights era — or deepen America’s divide?

From hit lists on social media to calls for political violence on campus, this episode dives into the shocking trend of glorifying assassinations and the urgent need to hold those responsible accountable. We discuss Clemson University’s controversial handling of faculty and staff celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk, the double standards in political response, and how students and citizens are taking action to stop this culture of violence. But this isn’t just about politics—it’s also about a cultural shift. The aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination has sparked a surge of young people, especially men, returning to church and exploring faith for the first time. Hear stories of a generation grappling with grief, morality, and hope, and discover why this moment is shaping the future of conservative activism, religious engagement, and civic responsibility.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has shaken the nation, exposing deep ideological divides and the dangerous currents of radicalization online. In this episode, we explore the events surrounding the attack, the individuals involved, and the broader implications for political discourse, free speech, and public safety. From eyewitness accounts to social media networks, we examine how fringe groups and extremist ideologies are fueling real-world violence. We also discuss the media’s coverage—or lack thereof—and the moral and cultural choices facing Americans in a moment that may define a “before and after” in modern politics. This episode is a call to understand, discern, and respond responsibly in a world where words can inspire action, and where every citizen’s choices matter in shaping the future.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk marks a pivotal moment in U.S. politics—dividing history into “before” and “after” this tragedy. In this episode, we dive into the circumstances surrounding the attack, the backgrounds of the individuals involved, and the troubling online networks that may have influenced them. We explore the media’s coverage, the political implications, and the attempts to manipulate the narrative. From eyewitness accounts to commentary on radicalization and ideological warfare, this episode examines how one event has ignited conversations across the nation, revealing the deep divides, hidden agendas, and critical decisions every American now faces. This is a story of agency, consequence, and the fight to preserve truth in a polarized world.

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, a troubling pattern of politically motivated violence is emerging. From social media radicalization to connections with fringe groups, this episode examines the shooter’s background, the disturbing online subcultures that may have influenced him, and the broader implications for public safety. We also explore how Charlie Kirk’s message continues to resonate, with thousands of young people starting new chapters of his movement and finding purpose even after his death. Experts weigh in on the radicalization of “wound collectors,” the intersection of ideology and online communities, and the urgent need to recognize and address this growing culture of violence before it spreads further. This episode is a deep dive into the collision of politics, radicalization, and the enduring impact of one influential voice.

As social media on the left posts hit lists and glorifies assassinations, a dangerous culture of political violence threatens to take hold. In this episode, we speak with Jackson Heaberlin, social chair of the Clemson College Republicans, about faculty and staff calling for the deaths of conservatives, the lack of decisive action from university leadership, and the stark double standards in response to violent movements. We examine why holding people accountable—without infringing on free speech—is critical to stopping this trend before it spirals into mass bloodshed. Hear firsthand accounts from campus and learn how students and citizens are demanding accountability to protect lives and free expression.

In this episode, we dive into the disturbing trend of political violence being normalized and even celebrated on parts of social media. From George Carlin’s chilling observations about assassinations to the modern reality of online doxxing campaigns, university controversies, and escalating rhetoric, we explore how free speech collides with responsibility. Should those who glorify violence face consequences at work? Is this the beginning of a dangerous cultural shift—or the last chance to stop it? Join us as we unpack the moral, political, and societal stakes in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

A tense, investigative episode that parses worrying patterns raised in recent shootings: two brutal attacks in three weeks that targeted religious and right-of-center spaces, online chatter linking perpetrators to transgender and “furry” communities, and allegations that organized left-wing or antifa-affiliated networks may have played a role. Hosts sift through social-media posts, claims of prior threats, and reports of attacks on border-patrol agents to ask whether these incidents are isolated or part of an accelerating trend — and what law enforcement, campuses, and the media should do in response.

A reflective, urgent episode exploring the national response to Charlie Kirk’s assassination — from peaceful vigils in Utah to surging youth activism and debates over free speech, censorship, and civil-rights rhetoric. We trace the contrast between nonviolent public mourning and incendiary online celebrations, examine claims that Kirk’s death is sparking a modern civil-rights movement, and unpack how his legacy is already mobilizing thousands of new campus chapters, petitions, and global demonstrations. Guests and callers describe the emotional impact on families and young people, while hosts ask whether this tragedy will deepen divisions or coalesce a broad coalition for free-speech protections. Trigger warning: this episode discusses political violence, threats, and graphic rhetoric.

Representative Jordan Pace joins the show to unleash fury over Clemson University’s refusal to immediately fire employees who publicly celebrated the assassination of Charlie Kirk and called for more political killings. From explosive tweets to six-figure salaries funded by taxpayers, the scandal is raising questions about free speech, accountability, and the role of tenure in protecting radical rhetoric. Pace lays out his proposal to freeze Clemson’s $300 million in state funding, end tenure across South Carolina universities, and finally strip DEI initiatives from taxpayer budgets. With pressure mounting from legislators, college Republicans, and even former President Trump, will Clemson’s leadership act — or face defunding?

A blistering, no-holds-barred look at the fallout after Charlie Kirk’s killing — how political violence, campus outrage and social-media hit lists are reshaping America’s conversation about free speech. We walk through the weekend’s crowd-sourced reactions, the explosive Clemson controversy, comparisons to historic assassinations, and what it means when political disagreement spills into calls for violence. Trigger warning: this episode discusses graphic rhetoric, threats, and political extremism. Tune in for clear-eyed analysis, on-the-ground examples, and a debate about accountability, consequences, and how to stop escalation before it becomes a pattern.