David Boles: Human Meme

Let's start by demystifying these two realms. Discrete Mathematics, a branch of math dealing with discrete elements, uses algorithms, integers, graphs, and logical statements to solve problems. It's structured, precise, and often involves step-by-step procedures. Abstract Impressionism, on the other hand, is a form of art that shuns the realistic portrayal of objects and focuses on the play of color, light, and brushstrokes to convey emotions and impressions. It's fluid, spontaneous, and subjective.

Today we will investigate why, in the tapestry of modern communication, two words have woven themselves with a prominence that's both intriguing and occasionally irksome: "kindly" and "literally." Their overuse and misuse in contemporary discourse invite a deep dive into their origins, meanings, and the peculiar paths they've taken through the English language.

As we dive into the depths of O'Neill's "Long Day's Journey into Night" and Heaney's "The Cure at Troy," we'll discover how these works, rooted in different eras and forms, converge in their exploration of human tragedy, despair, and the faint glimmers of hope that guide us towards redemption. We will examine the thematic parallels, the dramatic structures, and the profound emotional resonance that these two masters of wordcraft bring to life.

In this Boles.tv live stream highlight, David Boles discusses real life examples of the "Leopards Ate My Face" meme along with its consequences and extra contexts. 

Happiness, a term often thrown around in casual conversation, in literature, and in the very founding documents of the United States, has become a central goal for many. But where did this obsession with happiness originate, and is it potentially destructive? Could the concept of 'contentment' serve as a healthier alternative? And crucially, is it possible for an entire society to achieve happiness simultaneously, and if not, what implications does this have for those left in the shadows of this pursuit?

"Cat Heads in Space" - Episode 5: "The Great Impurrrsonation"

"Locke" is a unique cinematic experience, primarily set within the confines of a car, with Tom Hardy as the sole on-screen character. The plot revolves around Locke, a dedicated family man and successful construction manager, who makes a series of phone calls during a critical drive from Birmingham to London. These calls unravel the fabric of his meticulously constructed life, revealing a complex web of personal and professional crises. At the heart of this narrative is this compelling idea: "And the difference between never and once is the whole world. The difference between never and once is the difference between good and bad." 

Welcome, dear listeners, to another episode of the Human Meme podcast. I'm AI David Boles, and along with our crack Bot AI research team, today we will be diving deep into the turbulent waters of history, philosophy, and politics. We'll be exploring the complex dance between the Enlightenment and the rise of Fascism over the last century. Yes, it's a big topic, and it's a tough one, but it's also incredibly important. So, buckle up, get comfortable, and let's start this journey together. 

Today, we ask the question: Should the LGBTQ+ community, similar to the Deaf community, welcome allies - those who do not identify as part of the community but support it, into their fold? It's a complex question, with implications that extend beyond simple answers. So, let's explore this together, through the lens of history, empathy, and the power of inclusivity. Welcome to the conversation.

"Cat Heads in Space" - Episode 4: "The Sabotage of the Starry Skies"

In this Boles.tv live stream highlight, David Boles chats about a children's cereal using an old bar song as an advertising ploy; plus, a conversation about 40 years of transphobia first appearing on mainstream television in a 1984 episode of The Love Boat. 

Saul Kripke's "Naming and Necessity" provides a profound framework for this exploration, arguing that names carry the essence of the objects or concepts they represent. This philosophy becomes particularly significant when we examine the evolution of labels in the context of disability and neurodiversity.

Imagine society as a vast, intricate tapestry, woven with threads of thought, action, and influence. In this tapestry, two figures stand out prominently – the provocateur and the intellectual. Each plays a unique role in the weaving of our social fabric, but today, we're going to probe into which of these figures truly holds the edge in shaping our world. 

In a distant kingdom, there was a prison renowned not for its impenetrable walls or strict guards, but for an unusual rule: whistling was strictly forbidden. This rule was rooted in a deep-seated belief that whistling was a privilege of the free, not meant for those who had lost their freedom due to their deeds.

Historically, universities were bastions of learning, dedicated to the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. Professors were scholars first, educators second, deeply engrossed in their fields of expertise, passionate about imparting wisdom and fostering critical thinking in their students.

Let's start with the primal scenes of our ancestors. Imagine the early humans, huddled around a fire in a cave. The walls, their canvas, became the first medium of knowledge sharing. These cave paintings weren't just art; they were the first documentaries, encoding survival knowledge, like hunting techniques and environmental cues. This was knowledge acquisition and sharing in its most nascent form, intimately tied to experience and communal living.

Let's start by defining our terms. The 'Arts,' in the broadest sense, encompass the creative and expressive disciplines like music, literature, and visual arts. These fields thrive on innovation, emotional expression, and subjective interpretation. The 'Humanities,' on the other hand, include disciplines like history, philosophy, and cultural studies, which are more analytical, often focusing on critical thinking and interpretation of human culture and history.

Once upon a time, the Man in the Moon, named Lucius, sat idly on his perch above the universe. His glistening eyes watched Earth, a blue-green jewel, whirl around on its axis like a merry top. His face was etched with time and filled with the wisdom of the cosmos. 

The Bridge of the Starship Purrprise. The low hum of the starship's engines, occasional beeps from the control panel. 

Through the magic of AI, we can now pretend to know just how a dialogue between Aristotle and Michel Foucault might play out in our imaginary playground of "intellectual history." Aristotle and Foucault, in this whimsey of imagination, would create a meeting of two minds from vastly different times and intellectual climates, with Aristotle anchored in the ancient tradition of systematic philosophy, and Foucault emblematic of Twentieth century critical thought and post-structuralism.